Past Events

  • 2023 Mar 24

    Outcome-Driven Dynamic Refugee Assignment with Allocation Balancing

    1:00pm to 2:00pm

    Location: 

    SEC 1.413, & streamed via Zoom at: https://harvard.zoom.us/j/95184948637?pwd=bXBIc2U5MEZ0QmRUb01WQ0o0SXRCdz09

    Elisabeth C. Paulson (Harvard Business School)

    Outcome-Driven Dynamic Refugee Assignment with Allocation Balancing

    Abstract: This work proposes two new dynamic assignment algorithms to match refugees and asylum seekers to geographic localities within a host country. The first, currently implemented in a multi-year pilot in Switzerland, seeks to maximize the average predicted employment level (or any measured outcome of interest) of refugees through a minimum-discord online assignment algorithm. Although the proposed algorithm achieves near-optimal expected...

    Read more about Outcome-Driven Dynamic Refugee Assignment with Allocation Balancing
  • 2023 Mar 10

    Multi-channel Autobidding with Budget and ROI Constraints

    1:00pm to 2:00pm

    Location: 

    SEC 1.413, & streamed via Zoom at: https://harvard.zoom.us/j/95184948637?pwd=bXBIc2U5MEZ0QmRUb01WQ0o0SXRCdz09

    Negin Golrezaei, MIT Sloan

    March 10, 2023, SEC 1.413 (in-person)

    Multi-channel Autobidding with Budget and ROI Constraints

    Abstract: In digital online advertising, advertisers procure ad impressions simultaneously on multiple platforms, or so-called channels, such as Google Ads, Meta Ads Manager, etc., each of which consists of numerous ad auctions. We study how an advertiser maximizes total conversion (e.g. ad clicks) while satisfying aggregate return-on-investment (ROI) and budget constraints across all channels. In practice, an advertiser does...

    Read more about Multi-channel Autobidding with Budget and ROI Constraints
  • 2023 Mar 03

    Tao Lin & Lily Xu talks

    1:00pm to 2:00pm

    Location: 

    SEC 1.413, & streamed via Zoom at: https://harvard.zoom.us/j/95184948637?pwd=bXBIc2U5MEZ0QmRUb01WQ0o0SXRCdz09

    Tao Lin

    Persuading a Behavioral Agent: Approximately Best Responding and Learning

    Abstract: The classic Bayesian persuasion model assumes that the receiver is fully Bayesian and best responds to the sender’s signaling scheme. In this talk, I will talk about two alternative (and more realistic) behavioral models for the receiver: (1) approximately best responding, and (2) learning. We analyze how these two behavioral models affect the sender’s utility in the Bayesian persuasion problem. We first show that, under natural assumptions, approximately best-...

    Read more about Tao Lin & Lily Xu talks
  • 2023 Feb 24

    Auctions between Regret-Minimizing Agents: On Learning Dynamics and User Incentives

    1:00pm

    Location: 

    The Zoom link is as usual: https://harvard.zoom.us/j/95184948637?pwd=bXBIc2U5MEZ0QmRUb01WQ0o0SXRCdz09 (password: econcs)
    This Friday 1-2pm fully on Zoom, we have Yoav Kolumbus (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) on:

    Auctions between Regret-Minimizing Agents: On Learning Dynamics and User Incentives

    Abstract: The usage of automated learning agents is becoming increasingly prevalent in many online economic applications such as online auctions and automated trading. In this talk we will discuss the strategic situations that the users of such automated learning agents are facing. We propose to view the outcomes of the agents’ dynamics as inducing a “meta-game” between the users....
    Read more about Auctions between Regret-Minimizing Agents: On Learning Dynamics and User Incentives
  • 2023 Feb 17

    The Method of Equal Shares for Participatory Budgeting

    1:00pm to 2:00pm

    Location: 

    SEC 1.413, and streamed via Zoom: https://harvard.zoom.us/j/95184948637?pwd=bXBIc2U5MEZ0QmRUb01WQ0o0SXRCdz09

    This Friday, 1-2pm in SEC 1.413, we are very excited to have Dominik Peters (LAMSADE) speak in-person on:

    The Method of Equal Shares for Participatory Budgeting

    Abstract: In Participatory Budgeting, cities allow their residents to influence the...

    Read more about The Method of Equal Shares for Participatory Budgeting
  • 2023 Feb 10

    Bailey Flanigan & He Sun

    1:00pm to 2:30pm

    Location: 

    SEC 1.413 https://goo.gl/maps/UjUiWMGZCEGh5qMr9
    Fridays 1-2pm in SEC 1.413 

    Bailey Flanigan (Carnegie Mellon)

    Distortion under public-spirited voting

    Abstract: A key promise of democratic voting is that, by accounting for all constituents’ preferences, it produces decisions that benefit the constituency overall. It is alarming, then, that all deterministic voting rules have unbounded distortion: all such rules — even under reasonable conditions — will sometimes select outcomes that yield essentially no value for constituents. In this talk — based on our paper...

    Read more about Bailey Flanigan & He Sun
  • 2023 Feb 10

    The Method of Equal Shares for Participatory Budgeting

    1:00pm to 2:00pm

    Location: 

    SEC 1.413, & streamed via Zoom at: https://harvard.zoom.us/j/95184948637?pwd=bXBIc2U5MEZ0QmRUb01WQ0o0SXRCdz09

    February 17, 1-2pm in SEC 1.413

    Dominik Peters (LAMSADE)

    The Method of Equal Shares for Participatory Budgeting

    In Participatory Budgeting, cities allow their residents to influence the city’s budget through a vote. The standard voting method simply sorts the project proposals by their number of votes, and then greedily selects projects until the budget limit is reached. We have developed a new voting rule, the Method of Equal Shares, that leads to fairer outcomes. It does this by providing...

    Read more about The Method of Equal Shares for Participatory Budgeting
  • 2022 Dec 09

    Controlling Cooperation in Strategic Environments

    1:00pm to 2:00pm

    Location: 

    Friday at 1pm in SEC 1.413 streamed via Zoom at the link: https://harvard.zoom.us/j/95184948637?pwd=bXBIc2U5MEZ0QmRUb01WQ0o0SXRCdz09

    This Friday, 1pm-2pm in SEC 1.413, we will be having our final EconCS seminar of the semester, featuring Andreas Haupt from MIT. He will be speaking in-person on:

    Controlling Cooperation in Strategic Environments

    Abstract:

    In many strategic environments, a particular level of cooperation is desired: Cooperation between countries in climate action is considered desirable, while cooperation between sellers in a market is often considered collusion, and undesirable. This set of two projects asks how to control the level of...

    Read more about Controlling Cooperation in Strategic Environments

Pages